X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: GmailId116c61bd790814e8 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: Delivered-To: ronzzer@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.157.20 with SMTP id f20cs252097wae; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.127.1 with SMTP id z1mr3967769wac.1197324625188; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-0708.google.com (wa-out-0708.google.com [209.85.146.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m10si7332729waf.2007.12.10.14.10.13; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-NOBsYgUAAAA6z1EUxVATALpr4mRYHkk9=ronzzer=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 209.85.146.240 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.146.240; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-NOBsYgUAAAA6z1EUxVATALpr4mRYHkk9=ronzzer=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 209.85.146.240 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=grbounce-NOBsYgUAAAA6z1EUxVATALpr4mRYHkk9=ronzzer=gmail.com@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@googlegroups.com Received: by wa-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m18so1042015waf for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to:received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; bh=LEMQoZBXuHONlX47cZOHrg4Y5aCLes3UqJCaqi0g67Q=; b=JMVRvh9EQzbuuQOOav68fkpsaRHpHNKV4UUDQT8bmVEiLK58Ufy5kKX4s2KYMYRnh6QMYHH3NYjeH2kJe590vtlP6P9uXsKm+jKYpRUaODnDbti6ulezLY74JZQOPkLtkP4TuMVKmqxUwMLANY9tNzEzHWS+qmT240hUs35sq68= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; b=g7TGFfZQBrcHG0v3JM9mN4fsenj0lmHK1iW4hC8vM5SwNkpITOXYsm5Anb6NE7tKhT7OxQrW37rTA79B2RGugNyuEaj7u7yjv6yjQbkuuL8QeoCXSrNWGshpCRHGAwu/K76J8KmZg0ADVg0MX2J1cuVwVSBzKShjyHN8LfJDs5M= Received: by 10.114.182.1 with SMTP id e1mr276591waf.1197324613306; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.106.179.39 with SMTP id b39gr9530prf; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:07 -0800 (PST) X-Sender: gmorlan@tampabay.rr.com X-Apparently-To: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.35.14.4 with SMTP id r4mr15488237pyi.1197324606379; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:06 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x46si37889908pyg.2007.12.10.14.10.06; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gmorlan@tampabay.rr.com designates 71.74.56.123 as permitted sender) client-ip=71.74.56.123; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gmorlan@tampabay.rr.com designates 71.74.56.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gmorlan@tampabay.rr.com Received: from lorenzy5yllpkh ([72.184.17.31]) by hrndva-omta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20071210221005.RXGN16876.hrndva-omta03.mail.rr.com@lorenzy5yllpkh> for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:10:05 +0000 From: "Loren Morlan" To: References: <025c01c83b69$61b90760$252b1620$@rr.com> <011701c83b2a$393ca4c0$6801a8c0@Speedy> In-Reply-To: <011701c83b2a$393ca4c0$6801a8c0@Speedy> Subject: {Fx Autotrader's Emporium} Re: GBP/USD 12/10/07 4 HOUR EW count vs previous EW count Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:09:09 -0500 Message-ID: <02b201c83b79$4b290440$e17b0cc0$@rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B3_01C83B4F.6252FC40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acg7dcHg6CGacE0gS12C0Hq6Emp+cQAAX+cg Content-Language: en-us Reply-To: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com Sender: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com Precedence: bulk X-Google-Loop: groups Mailing-List: list fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com; contact fx-autotraders-emporium-owner@googlegroups.com List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: , ------=_NextPart_000_02B3_01C83B4F.6252FC40 Content-Type: text/plain Jim, My usual abbreviations are: RD = reverse divergence RND = reverse negative divergence RPD = reverse positive divergence CD = classic divergence CND = classic negative divergence CPD = classic positive divergence LRC = Linear regression channel SDC = standard deviation channel EW = Elliott Wave AW = Awesome Oscillator AO = Accelerator Oscillator Loren From: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com [mailto:fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tiger Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:43 AM To: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com Subject: {Fx Autotrader's Emporium} Re: GBP/USD 12/10/07 4 HOUR EW count vs previous EW count Loren I really like your charts, but i have a question ... On the previous chart and post you had initials ... CPD and an A/D indicator and LRC I'm assuming is Linear Regression ... In this new one you have initials ... CND ... What do the initial stand for ... thanks ... Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: Loren Morlan To: Divergence@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:15 PM Subject: {Fx Autotrader's Emporium} GBP/USD 12/10/07 4 HOUR EW count vs previous EW count Attach 4 hour chart compared with previous EW count this date. The previous Cable chart posted today showed A, B, C wave count in the 4 hour period with the suggested beginning of Wave 1. The attached chart shows a different Wave count following the price high. The present chart shows five sub-waves from the chart high and is the accurate appearance of impulse corrective Wave A. Impulse waves have 5 waves, corrective Waves have 3. The previous EW count in the early posted chart is likely incorrect. However in the 4 hour period it may nevertheless produce a profitable long trade. The current chart EW count suggests the beginning of Wave B which is normally not traded in the 1 minute chart period. In the larger 4 hour period the B Wave may be traded although it is a higher risk period. The B wave will have an a, b and c Wave pattern (corrective of Wave A) for the ultimate high of Wave B. The high of Wave B is sometimes higher than prior Wave 4 high. Wave B high is marked by a CND in either AO and/or A/D. Thereafter corrective impulse Wave C begins with 5 sub-waves. Wave C is often proportional to the A Wave decline. Correct EW count is important with respect to an understanding of where price is located within the EW cycle. The two Cable charts posted today demonstrate an incorrect and a correct EW count. LRC low or high lines often identify significant points in the EW cycle and in the 4 hour period offer a trading opportunity. Middle LRC line often mark important support or resistance levels in the EW cycle. In this respect the middle line initially acted as support for Wave 1 decline and thereafter has acted as resistance to higher price. The middle line should again act as resistance to higher price as Wave B develops/unfolds. Loren _____ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fx Autotrader's Emporium" group. To post to this group, send email to fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fx-autotraders-emporium-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fx-autotraders-emporium?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- ------=_NextPart_000_02B3_01C83B4F.6252FC40 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jim,

 <= /p>

My usual abbreviations ar= e:

 <= /p>

RD =3D reverse divergence=

RND =3D reverse negative divergence

RPD =3D reverse positive divergence

CD =3D classic divergence=

CND =3D classic negative divergence

CPD =3D classic positive divergence

LRC =3D Linear regression= channel

SDC =3D standard deviatio= n channel

EW =3D Elliott Wave<= /o:p>

AW =3D Awesome Oscillator=

AO =3D Accelerator  = Oscillator

 <= /p>

Loren

 <= /p>

From: fx-autotraders= -emporium@googlegroups.com [mailto:fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tiger<= br> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:43 AM
To: fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Fx Autotrader's Emporium} Re: GBP/USD 12/10/07 4 HOUR EW co= unt vs previous EW count

 

Lor= en I really like your charts, but i have a question ... =

 

On = the previous chart and post you had initials ... =

 

CPD= and an A/D indicator and LRC I'm assuming is Linear Regression ...<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'>=

 

In = this new one you have initials ... CND ... =

 

Wha= t do the initial stand for ... thanks ... Jim 

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Loren Morlan

Sent: Monday, Decembe= r 10, 2007 11:15 PM

Subject: {Fx Autotrader'= s Emporium} GBP/USD 12/10/07 4 HOUR EW count vs previous EW count

 

Attach 4 hour chart compared with previous EW count thi= s date.

 

The previous Cable chart posted today showed  A, B= , C wave count in the 4 hour period with the suggested beginning of Wave 1. = ; The attached chart shows a different Wave count following the price high.

 

The present chart shows five sub-waves from the chart h= igh and is the accurate appearance of impulse corrective Wave A.  Impulse waves have 5 waves, corrective Waves have 3.  The previous EW count in = the early posted chart is likely incorrect.  However in the 4 hour period i= t may nevertheless produce a profitable long trade.

 

The current chart EW count suggests the beginning of Wa= ve B which is normally not traded in the 1 minute chart period.  In the larg= er 4 hour period the B Wave may be traded although it is a higher risk period.  The B wave will have an  a, b and c Wave pattern (correct= ive of Wave A) for the ultimate high of Wave B.  The high of Wave B is sometimes higher than prior Wave 4 high.  Wave B high is marked by a CN= D in either AO and/or A/D.  Thereafter corrective impulse Wave C begins w= ith 5 sub-waves.  Wave C  is  often proportional to the A Wave decline.

 

Correct EW count is important with respect to an understanding of where price is located within the EW cycle.  The two Cable charts posted today demonstrate an incorrect  and a correct EW count.

 

LRC low or high lines often identify significant points= in the EW cycle and in the 4 hour period offer a trading opportunity. &nbs= p; Middle LRC line often mark important support or resistance levels in the EW cycle.  In this respect the middle line initially acted as support for Wave 1 decline and thereafter has acted as resistance to higher price.  The middle line should again act as resistance to higher price as Wave B develops/unfolds.

 

Loren

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &q= uot;Fx Autotrader's Emporium" group.
To post to this group, send e= mail to fx-autotraders-emporium@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th= is group, send email to fx-autotraders-emporium-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com=
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/f= x-autotraders-emporium?hl=3Den
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~= ------~--~---

------=_NextPart_000_02B3_01C83B4F.6252FC40--